Pothole that was previously reported
Reported in the Potholes / Highway Condition category by Roddy Owen-Smith at 18:05, Sunday 23 February 2020
Sent to Northamptonshire County Council 5 minutes later. ref: 2016732.
I reported this pothole at the same time (with pictures) of a large hole that has now been repaired. Now 3 x separate and fast worsening holes. Once again debris (that can be clearly seen) is being flicked out of this hole into People and adjacent parked cars. Dangerous! Did also state previously that it would be of Value to send a crew in and repair ALL defects rather than just the ones directly reported. These were directly next to the previously reported. And included, with pictures, in said original report. Also including that Lime Avenue is used by Farm vehicles and Heavy Plant vehicles.
Thank you for reporting a fault. We will use the information you have provided to assess and prioritise this fault in accordance with our published response times for fault reports.
State changed to: Investigating
Posted by Northamptonshire County Council at 18:10, Sunday 23 February 2020
Thank you for your enquiry. A works order has been raised and will be completed 7 days.
State changed to: Action scheduled
Posted by Northamptonshire County Council at 11:33, Tuesday 25 February 2020
Thank you for reporting a fault on the highway, the highways team have now resolved the issue.
State changed to: Fixed
Posted by Northamptonshire County Council at 15:25, Friday 28 February 2020
The area of this pothole has only been 'partly' repaired. In this I mean that while the hole has been filled, the surrounding area, which is why this hole developed, is still un-repaired. This will inevitably result in a 3rd visit to repair what essentially is the same defect. The same is evident on other roads in the village and surrounding areas. 'Opportunities Missed' is how I would best describe it. I have previously reported that putting a team in the village to repair All defects/holes. Not just the specific defects reported. This is evident where there is a fast emerging hole right next to the one reported, so resulting in 2 visits to exactly then same location. The only point being made here is that of hopefully assisting in efficiency and associated costs. One visit to deal with primary defect and nearby remedial works must be more efficient than 2 or 3 x Primary visits.....?
State changed to: Open
Posted by Roddy Owen-Smith at 19:28, Monday 23 March 2020
Still open, via questionnaire
Provide an update